What’s changed? Technology has improved significantly in space planning software. Data sources have become more plentiful, including store-level data, consumer data, and most recently, Shopper research data.
There are also many things that have remained the same in space management for both Retailers and Manufacturers:
Retailers
Manufacturers
Strategic space management has the potential to become much more than a picture of the shelf (see my previous blog post). When you use advanced shelving best practices it can become:
All of this impacts the bottom line for the Retailer.
The opportunity? Improved understanding and decision-making of space management at a higher level in organizations, ultimately resulting in more strategic approaches to advanced space management and improved collaboration between Retailers and Manufacturers.
Here are some resources to help you get started:
Adding basic item-level performance data to a planogram helps you differentiate one product from another, beyond product dimensions. Performance data is non-static data that provides information about how a product sells. It can be provided at different levels of store hierarchies – obviously, if store-level data is provided, store-specific planograms can be developed.
This data can be sourced from Nielsen or IRI syndicated data, shipment data, Retailer POS data, or forecast data. Shopper insight data is another performance data source that can be integrated into planograms at a more sophisticated level. This data source is normally market research focused, which provides a different perspective than other data sources.
History is the easiest data source that Retailers and Manufacturers have at their fingertips on which to create planograms. However, this approach misses the fact that store performance last year will not equate to store performance this year. A best practice is to use forecast data, instead of historical data, for the upcoming time period when the planogram will be implemented. Forecast data takes into consideration the expected future behavior based on all causal factors, including seasonality, price sensitivity, and promotional events. This best practice provides a more realistic dataset from which to work.
Product placement has to consider the target Shopper. You want to make products that Shoppers are most likely to buy, easy to reach and/or lift from the shelf. Use the consumer decision tree for the best layout based on how the Shopper shops the section. Also, think about your target Shopper’s needs when merchandising the shelf. For example, if you are merchandising clothing, you should keep the small clothes on the bottom racks, medium on the middle racks and large on the top racks. You should have long or tall products at the top of the planogram, and glass bottles and heavy items on the lower shelves.
Focus on the Shopper also creates an opportunity (or hindrance!) to move to store cluster and store-specific planograms. Without moving to this more sophisticated approach, you can’t possibly meet the needs of your most important Shoppers. Keep in mind, the change to a more sophisticated approach should be an evolution, starting with one planogram, moving to many planograms, then moving to localized, and then finally to store-specific.
The following graphic lists some of the pros and cons of store-specific planograms:
“Why Create Planograms?”
Back in my P&G days, we used to get asked to create hundreds of different iterations of planograms behind new product launches or new concepts. This required hundreds of manhours – usually with very little leadtime – to accommodate pretty much every major Retailer’s category section sizes. We spent less time behind analyzing the implications of the planogram to the Retailer’s inventory and sales, and more time on pumping out a lot of POGs, with little to poor execution of these initial planograms.
Sound familiar? That's because you should only create all section sizes and options once Retailers make their decision on the plan you are selling. Retailers must accept
your idea and get a conceptual picture of the shelf before you spend the time & resources to create the planograms required for their stores. The idea here is not to spend time on planograms BEFORE the Retailer says “yes”.
There are many different reasons to create a planogram – some of which are less known than others. Planograms may be developed behind:
These are only some examples of the best practices for moving to a more advanced space management approach for your organization. Consider how your organization approaches strategic space management by answering these questions:
In summary, these are just a few areas that can help your organization obtain strategic advantage in shelving. Together they:
Looking for a strategic approach to Space Management & Shelving? Category Management Knowledge Group can help you, your team or your organization learn more through a single course or a customized program. We have some great category management training options available to meet your needs.
Check out our accredited course on Leveraging Data for Advanced Shelving Solutions, or watch a video preview of the course below.
|
$125 USD 30-day Access Hands-On Downloadable Reference Guide Knowledge Checks Course Test |